Andrew Bolt (Hun/Tele/Advertiser) had a blog post pulled on Monday. Mainly due to the fact that his post could have been interpreted as muckraking by making a big song and dance about a fraudulent Glenn Milne article in The Oz. An interesting part is that some are suggesting that Bolt might have posted after Milne’s column was pulled. Not only that, but News left the post online for a considerable amount of time after Milne's article was removed.
Milne, of course, is best known for attempting to blue Stephen Mayne one year on stage at the Walkley Awards. I had absolutely no need to mention that, but I'm hedging my bets in case Bolt is correct about his post being 'fair, accurate and in the public interest'.
Milne, of course, is best known for attempting to blue Stephen Mayne one year on stage at the Walkley Awards. I had absolutely no need to mention that, but I'm hedging my bets in case Bolt is correct about his post being 'fair, accurate and in the public interest'.
Today, in his column, he’s got me in stitches by squealing “censorship”. The problem with Bolt’s brand of satire, is that it’s often lost on his audience, who see his character’s flagrant racism and bullying as being the real deal. And this is where the problem starts.
I’m aware that Bolt’s blog is a bit of a testing ground for his wilder humour. What goes out there gets tested amongst the comments from the fruitcakes that dominate his readership and the eventually worked on a little harder. Eventually, Bolt creams off the stuff that’s silly enough to outrage and amuse, yet the stuff that’s too ‘out there’ gets forgotten about. What’s left gets written up as ‘proper’ copy in his columns in News’ south eastern newspapers.