This is part 2.
Part one is here.
So we had two questions hanging over our heads.
1. Who chooses to be gay? And
2. What reason would one have to choose a gay lifestyle?
Let’s look at the first one.
We’ve seen that you need to be gay, bi, asexual or sexually unusual in order to choose to be straight.
But what would you be in order to be gay?
Obviously, then, it stands to reason that if you choose to be gay, you must therefore be straight, bi, asexual, or something else again. But you would not be gay?
The conjecture from idiots who support the concept of “sexual choice” over “sexual hardwiring” believe that we are all wired the same way and that we choose our sexuality.
Leaving aside the conundrum that straight people such as myself did not choose to be straight (I’m just not into blokes, that’s all), this site shows the two views, which it refers to as the extremes.
Personally, I think that these are the only two views – I don’t see much room for a grey area in between, which should give you all an idea how ridiculous this whole thing is.
Anyway, as you can see, homosexual behaviour is viewed by hardliners as being akin to alcoholism or drug addiction – something to be de-toxed out of.
Now this makes me mad.
The viewpoint of most reasonable people is that alcoholism and drug addiction require you to actually have tried the narcotic, first.
Then there’s a period of time that your body builds up a physical dependency.
When I first started lusting after females, I had not had a single intimate, let alone erotic encounter. Hardly comparable to a narcotics addiction, then is it?
OK then. So we’ll assume for argument purposes that someone (God, Gods, aliens, FSM, etc) hardwired us all as “straight”.
(For those of you who are gay and reading this, please do not get outraged. I have only ever read my mind, and thus it is the only assumption I can reasonably make. I know that it is not the case.)
This still leaves our second question – which may be paraphrased as, “What reason would a straight bloke have to choose to be gay?”
First of all – he would have to put up with the gay stigma.
Now I have worked with gay blokes and chicks over the years. One of my best mates is a gay bloke. One thing that they all have in common is that they all get massively discriminated against.
Or threatened. Abused. Bashed, even.
Why, I say why. Would someone who wasn’t gay, put themselves through this?
I cannot give an answer to that. Maybe someone else will.
Conservative Christians are one such group who believe that being gay is temptation from Satan, but we’re all really straight.
Tell this to my gay friends who claim to have never been attracted to the opposite sex in their life.
Anyway, you supposedly do a gay lifestyle in the same way that you do drugs or alcohol. Big deal, they say. You can change.
One group who believes that you choose your own sexuality is called Exodus International. Exodus believe that through the power of Christ, one can return to the straight life that God gave them.
What Exodus won’t tell you is that one of their founders ran off with a staffer in 1979, and are now “committed” in that awful, gay way where we can’t say “married”.
(In addition, their chairman was recently forced to resign over claims that he allegedly was in a gay bar flirting with patrons, recently)
Lets just use our sixth sense (common sense, natch) here and say, “Nup.”
So we know that no one chooses to be gay, and that there is no reason why anyone would choose to do so. That I can think of anyway.
So this brings us back to our original point:
What is the federal government’s problem with gay marriage?
We’ll look at this in our next post.