18 October 2007

The Gentle Art of Homeopathic Killing

This is really part 2.

Part 1 is here.

We discussed how The Quackometer was stomped on from a great height by the Society of Homeopaths because he wrote an unfavourable post about homeopathy.

You all know what I think. And if you look at Orac's post where I initially found this, you'll see the Streisand Effect going gangbusters.

So I thought I'd join in the fun - now that I have Andy "Le Canard Noir" Lewis' permission to re-post.

So without further ado, here it is:

The Gentle Art of Homeopathic Killing

by Le Canard Noir

The Society of Homeopaths (SoH) are a shambles and a bad joke. It is now over a year since Sense about Science, Simon Singh and the BBC Newsnight programme exposed how it is common practice for high street homeopaths to tell customers that their magic pills can prevent malaria. The Society of Homeopaths have done diddly-squat to stamp out this dangerous practice apart from issue a few ambiguously weasel-worded press statements.

The SoH has a code of practice, but my feeling is that this is just a smokescreen and is widely flouted and that the Society do not care about this. If this is true, then the code of practice is nothing more than a thin veneer used to give authority and credibility to its deluded members. It does nothing more than fool the public into thinking they are dealing with a regulated professional.

As a quick test, I picked a random homeopath with a web site from the SoH register to see if they flouted a couple of important rules:

48: • Advertising shall not contain claims of superiority. • No advertising may be used which expressly or implicitly claims to cure named diseases.

72: To avoid making claims (whether explicit or implied; orally or in writing) implying cure of any named disease.

The homeopath I picked on is called Julia Wilson and runs a practice from the Leicestershire town of Market Harborough. What I found rather shocked and angered me.

Straight away, we find that Julia M Wilson LCHE, RSHom specialises in asthma and works at a clinic that says,

Many illnesses and disease can be successfully treated using homeopathy, including arthritis, asthma, digestive disorders, emotional and behavioural difficulties, headaches, infertility, skin and sleep problems.

Well, there are a number of named diseases there to start off. She also gives a leaflet that advertises her asthma clinic. The advertising leaflet says,

Conventional medicine is at a loss when it comes to understanding the origin of allergies. ... The best that medical research can do is try to keep the symptoms under control. Homeopathy is different, it seeks to address the triggers for asthma and eczema. It is a safe, drug free approach that helps alleviate the flaring of skin and tightening of lungs...

Now, despite the usual homeopathic contradiction of claiming to treat causes not symptoms and then in the next breath saying it can alleviate symptoms, the advert is clearly in breach of the above rule 47 on advertising as it implicitly claims superiority over real medicine and names a disease.

Asthma is estimated to be responsible for 1,500 deaths and 74,000 emergency hospital admissions in the UK each year. It is not a trivial illness that sugar pills ought to be anywhere near. The Cochrane Review says the following about the evidence for asthma and homeopathy,

The review of trials found that the type of homeopathy varied between the studies, that the study designs used in the trials were varied and that no strong evidence existed that usual forms of homeopathy for asthma are effective.

This is not a surprise given that homeopathy is just a ritualised placebo. Hopefully, most parents attending this clinic will have the good sense to go to a real accident and emergency unit in the event of a severe attack and consult their GP about real management of the illness. I would hope that Julia does little harm here.

However, a little more research on her site reveals much more serious concerns. She says on her site that 'she worked in Kenya teaching homeopathy at a college in Nairobi and supporting graduates to set up their own clinics'. Now, we have seen what homeopaths do in Kenya before. It is not treating a little stress and the odd headache. Free from strong UK legislation, these missionary homeopaths make the boldest claims about the deadliest diseases.

A bit of web research shows where Julia was working (picture above). The Abha Light Foundation is a registered NGO in Kenya. It takes mobile homeopathy clinics through the slums of Nairobi and surrounding villages. Its stated aim is to,

introduce Homeopathy and natural medicines as a method of managing HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria in Kenya.

I must admit, I had to pause for breath after reading that. The clinic sells its own homeopathic remedies for 'treating' various lethal diseases. Its MalariaX potion,

is a homeopathic preparation for prevention of malaria and treatment of malaria. Suitable for children. For prevention. Only 1 pill each week before entering, during and after leaving malaria risk areas. For treatment. Take 1 pill every 1-3 hours during a malaria attack.

This is nothing short of being totally outrageous. It is a murderous delusion. David Colquhoun has been writing about this wicked scam recently and it is well worth following his blog on the issue.

Let's remind ourselves what one of the most senior and respected homeopaths in the UK, Dr Peter Fisher of the London Homeopathic Hospital, has to say on this matter.

there is absolutely no reason to think that homeopathy works to prevent malaria and you won't find that in any textbook or journal of homeopathy so people will get malaria, people may even die of malaria if they follow this advice.

Malaria is a huge killer in Kenya. It is the biggest killer of children under five. The problem is so huge that the reintroduction of DDT is considered as a proven way of reducing deaths. Magic sugar pills and water drops will do nothing. Many of the poorest in Kenya cannot afford real anti-malaria medicine, but offering them insane nonsense as a substitute will not help anyone.

Ironically, the WHO has issued a press release today on cheap ways of reducing child and adult mortality due to malaria. Their trials, conducted in Kenya, of using cheap mosquito nets soaked in insecticide have reduced child deaths by 44% over two years. It says that issuing these nets be the 'immediate priority' to governments with a malaria problem. No mention of homeopathy. These results were arrived at by careful trials and observation. Science. We now know that nets work. A lifesaving net costs $5. A bottle of useless homeopathic crap costs $4.50. Both are large amounts for a poor Kenyan, but is their life really worth the 50c saving?

I am sure we are going to hear the usual homeopath bleat that this is just a campaign by Big Pharma to discredit unpatentable homeopathic remedies. Are we to add to the conspiracy Big Net manufacturers too?

It amazes me that to add to all the list of ills and injustices that our rich nations impose on the poor of the world, we have to add the widespread export of our bourgeois and lethal healing fantasies. To make a strong point: if we can introduce laws that allow the arrest of sex tourists on their return to the UK, can we not charge people who travel to Africa to indulge their dangerous healing delusions?

At the very least, we could expect the Society of Homeopaths to try to stamp out this wicked practice? Could we?


I've said it before - homeopathy is a horribly convoluted web of complete lies. I sometimes think that anyone who buys into this rubbish deserves anything they get. Can people be protected from themselves?

But I guess that we have to accept that saving lives and money is an admirable aim, no matter if credulity and gullibility are the cause.

8 comments:

morisetn said...

Good blog post that certainly warrants being reposted elsewhere! I came off a bit strong earlier today - sorry, I've been declawed now.

Dikkii said...

You're kidding me.

Morisetn, you're about the most polite regular commenter I have, apart from Plonka.

Greg said...

As you know, Dikki, repeatability is the cornerstone of science. It seems that Le Canard Noir has an entirely repeatable method for rooting out fraudsters breaking their own piss-weak anti-fraud rules.

Do you think such methods might work here, under our local conditions?

Dikkii said...

I really wish you hadn't left that link, Greg.

I found this in under 5 seconds on acupuncture:

What does Acupuncture treat?
Addictions Alcohol, Drugs and smoking
Circulatory Disorders Anaemia, Angina, Arteriosclerosis and Hypertension
Emotional and Psychological disorders Anxiety, Depression, Insomnia and Stress
Ear, eye, nose and throat Dizziness, Earache, Hay fever, Sinusitis, Sore throat and Tinnitus
Gastrointestinal Disorders Abdominal bloating, Colitis, Constipation, Diarrhoea, Food allergies,
Gastritis, Haemorrhoids, Irritable bowel syndrome, Spastic colon
Gynaecological Genitourinary Disorders Chronic Bladder Infection, Complications in Pregnancy
Endometriosis, Fibroids, Impotence, Infertility, Kidney
Stones, Menopause, Morning sickness, Painful periods
Premenstrual syndrome (PMS), Sexual dysfunction
Immune Disorders Allergies, Candida, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Epstein-Barr virus, Fibromyalgia, Hepatitis, Lupus and Multiple Sclerosis
Musculoskeletal and Neurological Disorders Arthritis, Back pain, Bursitis, Bell's Palsy, Cerebral
Palsy, Headaches and Migraine, Muscle Spasm,
Neuralgia, Polio, Sciatica, Shingles, Stroke, Sprain
Tendonitis, Tennis elbow, Trigeminal neuralgia
Miscellaneous After surgery recovery, Chemotherapy/radiation side effects, Diabetes, Skin disorders
Weight Control
Respiratory Disorders Asthma, Bronchitis, Colds and Flu and Emphysema



Disgusting. Anything they left out, do you think?

Greg said...

To be fair, you can treat lupus or the common cold or what have you with acupuncture - or a kick up the bum. You just can't expect either to have any effect.

I think these shysters get around the whole Trade Practices Act thing by the careful distinction between treating versus curing.

Dikkii said...

I agree up to a point.

I think that claiming to "treat" rather than "cure" is intended to mislead, which is what Section 52 of the TPA is all about (Thou shalt not engage in misleading or deceptive conduct).

I'd love to see a prosecution or two.

Greg said...

Agreed!

What's needed is a test case, which means we need a wealthy benefactor to pony up the cash. Here's a plan:

1) Stand out the front of your local high street quack-merchant.

2) Intercept doddering old person seeking treatment and clearly not long for this world.

3) Ask them to put in a clause in their will to the effect of "If I die from what this quack is meant to be curing, I want $X to go into a trust to fund a class action suit".

4) Sign up half a dozen wrinklies. One of them is bound to pay out.

5) Wait a few months (weeks?) and get on the phone to a QC. (Not a touchy-feely human rights one, but a hard-nosed commercial one. Maybe whoever defended James Hardie in the asbestos case - presumably they're thoroughly ruthless and competent.)

Whaddaya reckon?

Dikkii said...

I reckon Slater & Gordon.

They have the runs on the board in being tough and ruthless, and I daresay, rough and toothless.

This is the law firm that created a new legal class of theft when they launched a class action on behalf of the shareholders against Pasminco.